Friday, January 4, 2013

Health Insurance for Early Stage & Mid-Market Companies ? WTIA ...

Health Insurance and the Mid-Market

Mid-market company size is somewhat of an amorphous term, usually defined by revenue or employee size. Although there is no hard and fast rule, mid-market companies generally are between $25m-$250m in annual revenues and between 50?500 employees.

In terms of Health Insurance, 50 employees is somewhat of a magic number as it is the point when insurance carriers look at the company-specific claim history and have less regulatory pricing and disclosure restrictions to deal with. Companies with less than 50 employees are typically put in a ?community pool? and have less control over rate increases.

?WTIA Health Trust and the Mid -Market

The WTIA?Health Trust?is a bona fide association health plan (AHP) that gives small companies (<50 employees) some of the same pricing benefits as large companies. The WTIA?Health Trust has 13 plan options that range from very rich to basic. All 13 plan options are considered ?fully insured? plan types. The WTIA?Health Trust?is extremely valuable to our small company members, literally saving them thousands of dollars per year while enabling them to be more competitive from a recruitment standpoint.

Unfortunately, the WTIA?Health Trust?is not the ideal solution for ?mid-market? companies, especially as company headcount approaches more than 100 employees.

Health Insurance ? How the ?System? works & Rules of Thumb

Most insurance carriers shoot for a claims loss ratio between 80%-85%. Said another way, they are targeting a 15%-20% profit on the premiums they take in. This profit goes directly to the insurance carriers and a portion of the proceeds are used to compensate insurance brokers and other service providers. Consider the following example:

Chart 1 - Jan 2013

This is a very simple example to illustrate how the system works. It also provides some nice ?material? rules of thumbs:

? 600 per month per employee is a reasonable starting point when forecasting health care costs for mid-market companies. This is blended cost between single employees and those with families or dependents. This concept is referred to as PEPM (per employee premium monthly).

? 100 employee company yields around ~$60k cost per month in health insurance. Again, this is a starting point for developing a general cost estimate.

? Insurance/service provider companies make ~$12k per month of a 100 person company

Why ?Self-insurance? mathematically makes sense for the Mid Market

Although the WTIA Health Trust has thirteen (13) plan options, it only has 1 real plan type-fully insured. Fully insured is the most traditional plan type with the carrier being responsible for almost of the claims and the employer being responsible for paying monthly premiums. There are; however, other plan types that are available with the ?self-insured? plan type being the next most common for mid-market companies. Using the same example above you can see why the self-insured plan type is attractive:

Chart 2 - Jan 2013

It is clear from the above example why self-insurance is so popular but also risky. Rather than paying premium costs the employer bears the ?claim risk?. Over time and with a large enough employee base this should theoretically result in massive savings as the employer will effectively eliminate the 15%-20% profit paid to outside parties. Much like gambling where the house should win over a large sample size, self -insurance should result in cheaper health insurance costs for employers over time.

The theoretical concept explained above is why the ?self-insurance? plan type is highly popular with mid-market companies. The key exercise that mid-market companies must go through in evaluating self?insurance is the underlying health of its employee base. If there are known medical conditions and/or a significant non-recurring claims expected, self?insurance is probably not the right solution.

Health Savings Accounts and why they are so popular

Health Savings Accounts (HSA?s) is a fully insured plan type; however, the deductible is much higher than in a traditional plan option. This factor keeps monthly premium costs down as there is less incentive for employees to use the health care system when they have a high deductible to cover. HSA?s usually allow for a free annual preventive visit (physical) and also have properties of a traditional IRA making it another investment vehicle for employees.

More employers have been selecting Health Savings plan options than ever before because it offers the risk protection of a fully insured plan with the cheaper costs associated with a self-insured plan. It also moves the responsibility to the employee and gets them active in the management of their health. Using the same example above, I have constructed a comparison for a generic 100 person tech company:

Chart 3 - Jan 2013

As you can see from the example above, the ?HSA offers a nice ?intermediate? option as it allows the employer to manage risk while realizing sizable savings.

WTIA health insurance options for large groups (Including Mid-Market)

The WTIA has traditionally focused on small group health insurance offerings (<50 employees) for its members. Recently, however, the WTIA?has been exploring health insurance offerings targeted at large groups (>50 employees) which certainly include mid-market companies. Specifically, the WTIA?has been working with its insurance carrier partner, Regence Blue Shield, to accomplish the following:

1) Develop a suite of insurance products (plan types) and services specifically tailored to member companies with 50 or more employees. This would include fully insured and self-insured (ASO) plan types.

2) Leverage the healthcare purchasing power of the technology industry in Washington State to deliver significant savings to member companies.

3) Offer competitively priced insurance products that are bundled with a WTIA?membership to provide access to our community and resource base.

We expect to have a large group offering in place by the summer of FY 2013.

Why should all this matter to you?

Washington law provides a way for small businesses to pool their purchasing power to buy health insurance through trade associations and member-governed groups, like the WTIA. These plans, called Association Health Plans or Affinity Group Plans, allow small employers the advantage of large group rates for health insurance. The WTIA?Health Trust?is just one of the many ways your membership can help you curb business costs while providing more value to your employees. But what happens when a small employer moves along in the business life cycle and becomes a mid-market employer? What happens when they become large? WTIA?is working hard to make sure there are scalable options in place that serve our member base in all stages of the business life-cycle.

With nationalized healthcare implementing in the near future, it?s important to understand not only what?s available, but what the very best option is for your unique business situation. What may be great for some, might not be the most cost effective for others.

For more information on what your options are, contact your WTIA?member representative.

Mike Monroe
Vice President of Operations & Finance
Washington Technology Industry Association

Source: http://wtiablog.org/2013/01/02/health-insurance-for-early-stage-mid-market-companies/

equatorial guinea marine helicopter crash chicago weather star jones wheres my refund photo of whitney houston in casket carrot top

Thursday, January 3, 2013

In pass-happy NFL, still helps to be able to run

ASHBURN, Va. (AP) ? As a wideout, Santana Moss wants Washington Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III to throw the ball as much as possible, of course, preferably in his direction.

As a football player hoping to advance in the playoffs, Moss wants the Redskins to do what they've done as well as anyone in the NFL this season: run, run, run.

"That's big to me. Everywhere I've played and been successful, we ran the ball to pass the ball. Nowadays, a lot of teams fling the ball everywhere, and you want to be a part of that as a receiver," Moss said. "But when you really want to win games, you have to have both parts of your offense working, the air and the ground. It's great to see we have that here."

They do, indeed, thanks in part to the man known as RG3, who set a rookie QB record by running for 815 yards, and to another rookie, Alfred Morris, who finished second in the league with 1,613 yards rushing. Washington averaged an NFL-high 169.3 yards on the ground, and its opponent in the first round of the NFC playoffs Sunday is the Seattle Seahawks, who ranked No. 3 at 161.2, led by Marshawn Lynch.

Clearly, as much as the NFL is a passing league, it still helps to be able to run the ball.

"It doesn't have to be great, but you have to have an effective running game to be able to be successful," said two-time Super Bowl champion John Elway, now the Denver Broncos executive VP of football operations. "The reason I say that is because, if you get leads, you've got to be able to eat clock with it and you've got to be able to keep people honest, especially pass-rushing teams."

Elway was the quarterback and Terrell Davis was a 2,000-yard running back when the Broncos won the 1999 Super Bowl, the last time the league's leading rusher earned an NFL championship (their coach then was Mike Shanahan, currently with the Redskins). It's only happened three other times since the AFL-NFL merger in 1970, according to STATS LLC, and always by the same guy: Emmitt Smith, with the Dallas Cowboys in 1993, 1994 and 1996.

A season's leader in yards passing, by the way, never has won a Super Bowl in that span, STATS said.

The top three rushers during this regular season are in the playoffs: Adrian Peterson of the Minnesota Vikings, Morris and Lynch. Other notable running backs in action this weekend include Arian Foster of the Houston Texans and Ray Rice of the Baltimore Ravens. The top three quarterbacks in yards passing, meanwhile, are done: Drew Brees of the New Orleans Saints, Matthew Stafford of the Detroit Lions and Tony Romo of the Cowboys. Two of the top three in yards receiving also have plenty of time on their hands now: Calvin Johnson of the Lions and Brandon Marshall of the Bears.

Come playoff time, it turns out, good running performances are a better indicator of success than good passing performances.

In playoff games in the Super Bowl era, teams with a 100-yard rusher are a combined 157-37 (a winning percentage of .809), while teams with a 300-yard passer are 57-66 (only .463), according to STATS.

Admittedly, that presents something of a chicken-and-egg scenario: Did teams get a lead and win because they ran the ball well? Or did they gain a lot of yards running because they already were ahead and were trying to run out the clock?

Either way, the Vikings, Seahawks and Redskins are unabashedly putting emphasis on the ground game. Seattle led the NFL by running on 55 percent of its offense's plays, Washington was next at 52.2, and Minnesota fifth at 48.6.

"I definitely want to keep the running backs highlighted. It's started to turn into more of a spread-, quarterback-friendly NFL," Peterson said, "but just keep letting them know that there are going to be running backs that can do this."

In addition to gaining yardage on its own, a good run game opens up room for play-action fakes to help the passing game.

"Especially in playoff football, it seems like the running game always plays a bigger part. The weather gets bad, it gets windy, and things like that. The ability to run the ball and stop the run is crucial," Redskins defensive tackle Barry Cofield said. "And it's what our team is built on."

Cofield said that Shanahan's first order of business as he opens planning meetings each Wednesday is to talk about how Washington's defense fared against the run in its previous game and what needs to be done against the run in the next game.

With a struggling second-year quarterback in Christian Ponder, and a transcendent running back in Peterson (whose 2,097 yards were the second-most in NFL history), it makes sense for the Vikings to, as their coach Leslie Frazier put it, "make no bones about it" that they're a run-first team.

"We're always confident in our run game. We don't shy away from it, and we know that's the type of team we are," Vikings fullback Jerome Felton said. "I think Coach Frazier built the team like that and we're confident in it. So, yeah, we still think the run is prevalent in this league."

Shanahan and the man he'll try to outcoach Sunday, Seattle's Pete Carroll, both agree with that sentiment.

And both are aware that their bruising running backs ? Carroll called Morris "a hammer"; Cofield said Lynch "runs like he's angry at everybody" ? provide a big boost to first-year quarterbacks Griffin and Russell Wilson.

"If you have the proper commitment and you build around it, it's maybe the best way you can count on being consistently successful," Carroll said. "And you know that, as you're bringing up a young quarterback, there's nothing better than to run the football as they grow. ... We always want to run the football ? for attitude, and just for the style of play."

___

AP Pro Football Writer Dave Campbell, AP Sports Writer Jon Krawczynski and AP National Writer Eddie Pells contributed to this report.

___

Connect with Howard Fendrich on Twitter at http://twitter.com/HowardFendrich

___

Online: http://pro32.ap.org/poll and http://twitter.com/AP_NFL

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/pass-happy-nfl-still-helps-able-run-211857044--nfl.html

chaka khan taylor swift safe and sound delilah nevis 2012 sports illustrated swimsuit same day flower delivery valentines day

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

New UGA research helps explain why girls do better in school

New UGA research helps explain why girls do better in school [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 2-Jan-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Chris Cornwell
cornwl@uga.edu
706-542-3670
University of Georgia

Athens, Ga. Why do girls get better grades in elementary school than boyseven when they perform worse on standardized tests?

New research from the University of Georgia and Columbia University published in the current issue of Journal of Human Resources suggests that it's because of their classroom behavior, which may lead teachers to assign girls higher grades than their male counterparts.

"The skill that matters the most in regards to how teachers graded their students is what we refer to as 'approaches toward learning,'" said Christopher Cornwell, head of economics in the UGA Terry College of Business and one of the study's authors. "You can think of 'approaches to learning' as a rough measure of what a child's attitude toward school is: It includes six items that rate the child's attentiveness, task persistence, eagerness to learn, learning independence, flexibility and organization. I think that anybody who's a parent of boys and girls can tell you that girls are more of all of that."

The study, co-authored by Cornwell and David Mustard at UGA and Jessica Van Parys at Columbia, analyzed data on more than 5,800 students from kindergarten through fifth grade. It examined students' performance on standardized tests in three categoriesreading, math and sciencelinking test scores to teachers' assessments of their students' progress, both academically and more broadly.

The data show, for the first time, that gender disparities in teacher grades start early and uniformly favor girls. In every subject area, boys are represented in grade distributions below where their test scores would predict.

The authors attribute this misalignment to what they called non-cognitive skills, or "how well each child was engaged in the classroom, how often the child externalized or internalized problems, how often the child lost control and how well the child developed interpersonal skills." They even report evidence of a grade bonus for boys with test scores and behavior like their girl counterparts.

This difference can have long-reaching effects, Cornwell said.

"The trajectory at which kids move through school is often influenced by a teacher's assessment of their performance, their grades. This affects their ability to enter into advanced classes and other kinds of academic opportunities, even post-secondary opportunities," he said. "It's also typically the grades you earn in school that are weighted the most heavily in college admissions. So if grade disparities emerge this early on, it's not surprising that by the time these children are ready to go to college, girls will be better positioned."

Research about gender differences in the classroom and beyond has grabbed headlines recently. Titles like Hannah Rosin's "The End of Men and the Rise of Women" and Kay Hymowitz's "Manning Up" have spent months on best-seller lists and inspired countless discussions in the media.

"We seem to have gotten to a point in the popular consciousness where people are recognizing the story in these data: Men are falling behind relative to women. Economists have looked at this from a number of different angles, but it's in educational assessments that you make your mark for the labor market," Cornwell said. "Men's rate of college going has slowed in recent years whereas women's has not, but if you roll the story back far enough, to the 60s and 70s, women were going to college in much fewer numbers. It's at a point now where you've got women earning upward of 60 percent of the bachelors' degrees awarded every year."

But despite changing college demographics, the new data may not be reflecting anything fundamentally new.

"My argument is that this has always been true about boys and girls. Girls didn't all of a sudden become more engaged and boys didn't suddenly become more rambunctious," Cornwell said. "Their attitudes toward learning were always this way. But it didn't show up in educational attainment like it does today because of all the factors that previously discouraged women's participation in the labor force, such as a lack of access to reliable birth control."

What remains unclear, however, is how to combat this discrepancy.

"The most common question we've gotten is whether or not the gender of the teacher matters in regards to grading students," Cornwell said. "But that's a question we can't answer because there's just not enough data available. As you can probably guess, the great majority of elementary school teachers are women."

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


New UGA research helps explain why girls do better in school [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 2-Jan-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Chris Cornwell
cornwl@uga.edu
706-542-3670
University of Georgia

Athens, Ga. Why do girls get better grades in elementary school than boyseven when they perform worse on standardized tests?

New research from the University of Georgia and Columbia University published in the current issue of Journal of Human Resources suggests that it's because of their classroom behavior, which may lead teachers to assign girls higher grades than their male counterparts.

"The skill that matters the most in regards to how teachers graded their students is what we refer to as 'approaches toward learning,'" said Christopher Cornwell, head of economics in the UGA Terry College of Business and one of the study's authors. "You can think of 'approaches to learning' as a rough measure of what a child's attitude toward school is: It includes six items that rate the child's attentiveness, task persistence, eagerness to learn, learning independence, flexibility and organization. I think that anybody who's a parent of boys and girls can tell you that girls are more of all of that."

The study, co-authored by Cornwell and David Mustard at UGA and Jessica Van Parys at Columbia, analyzed data on more than 5,800 students from kindergarten through fifth grade. It examined students' performance on standardized tests in three categoriesreading, math and sciencelinking test scores to teachers' assessments of their students' progress, both academically and more broadly.

The data show, for the first time, that gender disparities in teacher grades start early and uniformly favor girls. In every subject area, boys are represented in grade distributions below where their test scores would predict.

The authors attribute this misalignment to what they called non-cognitive skills, or "how well each child was engaged in the classroom, how often the child externalized or internalized problems, how often the child lost control and how well the child developed interpersonal skills." They even report evidence of a grade bonus for boys with test scores and behavior like their girl counterparts.

This difference can have long-reaching effects, Cornwell said.

"The trajectory at which kids move through school is often influenced by a teacher's assessment of their performance, their grades. This affects their ability to enter into advanced classes and other kinds of academic opportunities, even post-secondary opportunities," he said. "It's also typically the grades you earn in school that are weighted the most heavily in college admissions. So if grade disparities emerge this early on, it's not surprising that by the time these children are ready to go to college, girls will be better positioned."

Research about gender differences in the classroom and beyond has grabbed headlines recently. Titles like Hannah Rosin's "The End of Men and the Rise of Women" and Kay Hymowitz's "Manning Up" have spent months on best-seller lists and inspired countless discussions in the media.

"We seem to have gotten to a point in the popular consciousness where people are recognizing the story in these data: Men are falling behind relative to women. Economists have looked at this from a number of different angles, but it's in educational assessments that you make your mark for the labor market," Cornwell said. "Men's rate of college going has slowed in recent years whereas women's has not, but if you roll the story back far enough, to the 60s and 70s, women were going to college in much fewer numbers. It's at a point now where you've got women earning upward of 60 percent of the bachelors' degrees awarded every year."

But despite changing college demographics, the new data may not be reflecting anything fundamentally new.

"My argument is that this has always been true about boys and girls. Girls didn't all of a sudden become more engaged and boys didn't suddenly become more rambunctious," Cornwell said. "Their attitudes toward learning were always this way. But it didn't show up in educational attainment like it does today because of all the factors that previously discouraged women's participation in the labor force, such as a lack of access to reliable birth control."

What remains unclear, however, is how to combat this discrepancy.

"The most common question we've gotten is whether or not the gender of the teacher matters in regards to grading students," Cornwell said. "But that's a question we can't answer because there's just not enough data available. As you can probably guess, the great majority of elementary school teachers are women."

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-01/uog-nur010213.php

mountain lion hanley ramirez Christian Bale visits victims Perez Hilton national weather service kristen stewart Christian Bale

Fructose has different effect than glucose on brain regions that regulate appetite

Jan. 1, 2013 ? In a study examining possible factors regarding the associations between fructose consumption and weight gain, brain magnetic resonance imaging of study participants indicated that ingestion of glucose but not fructose reduced cerebral blood flow and activity in brain regions that regulate appetite, and ingestion of glucose but not fructose produced increased ratings of satiety and fullness, according to a preliminary study published in the January 2 issue of JAMA.

"Increases in fructose consumption have paralleled the increasing prevalence of obesity, and high-fructose diets are thought to promote weight gain and insulin resistance. Fructose ingestion produces smaller increases in circulating satiety hormones compared with glucose ingestion, and central administration of fructose provokes feeding in rodents, whereas centrally administered glucose promotes satiety," according to background information in the article. "Thus, fructose possibly increases food-seeking behavior and increases food intake." How brain regions associated with fructose- and glucose-mediated changes in animal feeding behaviors translates to humans is not completely understood.

Kathleen A. Page, M.D., of Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., and colleagues conducted a study to examine neurophysiological factors that might underlie associations between fructose consumption and weight gain. The study included 20 healthy adult volunteers who underwent two magnetic resonance imaging sessions in conjunction with fructose or glucose drink ingestion. The primary outcome measure for the study was the relative changes in hypothalamic (a region of the brain) regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) after glucose or fructose ingestion.

The researchers found that there was a significantly greater reduction in hypothalamic CBF after glucose vs. fructose ingestion. "Glucose but not fructose ingestion reduced the activation of the hypothalamus, insula, and striatum -- brain regions that regulate appetite, motivation, and reward processing; glucose ingestion also increased functional connections between the hypothalamic-striatal network and increased satiety."

"The disparate responses to fructose were associated with reduced systemic levels of the satiety-signaling hormone insulin and were not likely attributable to an inability of fructose to cross the blood-brain barrier into the hypothalamus or to a lack of hypothalamic expression of genes necessary for fructose metabolism."

Editorial: Fructose Ingestion and Cerebral, Metabolic, and Satiety Responses

Jonathan Q. Purnell, M.D., and Damien A. Fair, PA-C, Ph.D., of Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, write in an accompanying editorial that "these findings support the conceptual framework that when the human brain is exposed to fructose, neurobiological pathways involved in appetite regulation are modulated, thereby promoting increased food intake."

"? the implications of the study by Page et al as well as the mounting evidence from epidemiologic, metabolic feeding, and animal studies, are that the advances in food processing and economic forces leading to increased intake of added sugar and accompanying fructose in U.S. society are indeed extending the supersizing concept to the population's collective waistlines."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by JAMA and Archives Journals.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Kathleen A. Page et al. Effects of Fructose vs Glucose on Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Brain Regions Involved With Appetite and Reward Pathways. JAMA, 2013 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.116975

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/a-Y3ID_9RtI/130101182010.htm

madonna halftime m i a mia super bowl tom coughlin wes welker eli manning eli manning

Time to Think Anew in Healthcare ? Health Hub from Cleveland Clinic

American healthcare is in the middle of an unprecedented transformation. How can we meet the challenges that come with such change? As Abraham Lincoln said, ?We must think anew and act anew.?

Knowing that changes were coming, healthcare providers have been looking at ways to lower costs and expand access well before the passage of the federal Affordable Care Act of 2008.?

To help employers lower healthcare costs and at the same time enable more people to have access to our specialized services, we developed a bundled payment program with self-insured companies, such as Lowe?s.

Through the program with Lowe?s, the retailer?s employees have access to our cardiac surgery program with no out-of-pocket cost. The retailer pays a flat or ?bundled? rate for our services. Employees who are recommended by their local doctor for cardiac surgery have the option of coming to Cleveland Clinic. The company pays their airfare and lodging and waives the usual employee deductible.

These partnerships significantly reduce healthcare costs for employers, while also giving their employees greater access to the country?s best hospitals.

In some cases, our cardiologists have determined that the patient doesn?t actually need cardiac surgery and can be treated with medicine or some less invasive procedure. Since all our doctors are on salary, they have no financial incentive to order unnecessary treatment. Our goal is simply to give each patient the best care.

Since our alliance with Lowe?s in 2010, we?ve entered into similar agreements with several other employers around the country. Recently, we announced a similar agreement with Walmart.

Programs such as these represent a new way of thinking about how we deliver healthcare in the United States. They control costs, but most importantly, they improve quality by helping to get patients to the right place for the right care.

Delos M. Cosgrove, MD LinkedIn Profile

Source: http://health.clevelandclinic.org/2013/01/time-to-think-anew-in-healthcare/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=time-to-think-anew-in-healthcare

rett syndrome where the wild things are josh smith birdsong teresa giudice atlanta hawks flyers

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

I?m Bored. What?s Next?

boredIt?s just about 2013 and I gotta say, I?m a little bored. At least, the blogger in me is. As an investor things are just peachy. All this panic about overpriced consumer startups has led to a nice softening of the market (periodic reports of Blubbles are great for that). And other sectors, like business to business, is still under capitalized v. the consumer sector. But as a consumer and observer of tech, things feel very 2002ish to me. There?s been a lot of belt tightening, for example, as many startups are trying to make their seed rounds stretch just a little bit longer. But it?s more than that. I just don?t see the tons of crazy new ideas that I did a few years ago. Things that are genuinely new and interesting. Yeah, yeah, mobile. I get it. Everything?s mobile these days. LET?S GO MO-BILE! But really that?s just an IQ test. When you see bold new startups with nothing but a desktop strategy, you know they just don?t get it and you move on. But really a lot of the mobile stuff out there is just radioactive decay from the iPhone launching in 2007. 2007! Old news! Ancient platforms! Yeah, the iPhone and Android are great. But seriously, look at the top headline grabbers in tech news in 2012. Apple. Google. Facebook. Microsoft. Christ. It might as well still be 2007. I don?t want to read any more stories about how Facebook cloned something they couldn?t buy. Or that Twitter banned something that they tried to buy but Facebook got there first. Or the press regurgitating how Google+ is somehow not flailing. Or about the number of Android v. iPhone devices. Or Samsung?s patent mishaps. Or how Yahoo is winding down things in Asia. I certainly don’t want to, for example, spend another minute debating Hunter Walk on the nuances of social graphs or whether we should be given a way to efficiently remove friends from Facebook. For two other examples look at the post directly below this one, and (in a few minutes) the one directly above. Snoozers! I want something completely new and different to happen, and lots of it. Stuff that makes us change the way we think about a market, or the world. Something that inspires a new generation of crazy startups doing crazy things. I don?t want to be completely negative on the

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/zOMuUT45FpA/

allen iverson jr smith chris anderson rondo suspended bay bridge downton abbey season 3 presidents day

China's largest natural gas supplier pledged to increase its output to meet the...

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/beijingnews/posts/580878955262393

Karrueche Tran dodd frank Lark Voorhies Jennifer Livingston Orlando Cruz MLB Playoff Schedule arizona cardinals